Sue Ellen King had circled her retirement date on the calendar: March 8, 2015.
She had worked as a critical care nurse and nursing educator at University of Florida Health
(UF Health) in Jacksonville, Fla., for 38 years; co-workers joked that
she was there when the hospital’s foundation was laid, which happened to
be true. So the send-offs went on for days — parties in the units where
she had worked, a dinner in her honor, gifts including a framed photo
signed by colleagues.
Ms.
King felt ready. She’d turned 66, her full Social Security retirement
age. She’d invested fully in the hospital’s 401(k) plan and consulted
with a financial adviser. She and her husband, who had already retired,
had paid off the mortgage on their three-bedroom ranch. They took a
week’s trip to Hilton Head, S.C., to celebrate their impending freedom.
But
her retirement lasted just three months. “I’d done all the preparation,
except to really think about what life was going to be like,” Ms. King
said. Days spent organizing recipes and photos, and lunching with
friends, proved less engaging than expected.
So
when her handpicked replacement needed a maternity leave, Ms. King
jumped at the chance to return for three months. Now back at work in a
part-time position she designed for herself, she calls herself “a failed
retiree.”
Economists
refer to this sort of U-turn as “unretirement.” (In “partial
retirement,” another variant, an employee cuts back to part-time status
but doesn’t actually leave the workplace.)
Unretirement is becoming more common, researchers report. A 2010 analysis by Nicole Maestas, an economist at Harvard Medical School, found that more than a quarter of retirees later resumed working. A more recent survey,
from RAND Corporation, the nonprofit research firm, published in 2017,
found almost 40 percent of workers over 65 had previously, at some
point, retired.
“We
definitely see evidence that retirement is fluid,” said Kathleen
Mullen, a RAND senior economist and co-author of its American Working
Conditions Survey. “There’s less of the traditional schedule: work to a
certain age, retire, see the world. We see people lengthening their
careers.”
A
Pew Research Center analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor
Statistics supports that observation. It reported that the proportion of
Americans over age 65 who were employed, full-time or part-time, had climbed steadily from 12.8 percent in 2000 to 18.8 percent in 2016. More than half were working full time.
Even
more people might resume working if they could find attractive options.
“We asked people over 50 who weren’t working, or looking for a job,
whether they’d return if the right opportunity came along,” Dr. Mullen
said. “About half said yes.”
Why
go back to work? We hear endless warnings about Americans having failed
to save enough, and the need for income does motivate some returning
workers. But Dr. Maestas, using longitudinal data from the national
Health and Retirement Study, has found that the decision to resume
working doesn’t usually stem from unexpected financial problems or
health expenses.
“It
looks like something people are doing intentionally, instead of an
oh-my-god response: ‘I’m running out of money; I have to go back to
work,’” she said. “It’s much more about a choice.”
Longer
lives, better health and less physically taxing jobs than in previous
generations help provide that choice, Dr. Maestas pointed out. “You hear
certain themes: A sense of purpose. Using your brain,” she said. “And
another key component is social engagement.” Earning money, while
welcomed, rarely proved the primary incentive.
Michelle
Wallace, who lives in Broomfield, Colo., learned about purpose over 20
frustrating months. After decades in telecommunications, she said, she
retired abruptly from a project management position in 2013, when her
workplace turned chaotic and hostile.
She’d
saved enough to feel economically secure. But without a job, “I felt
like I was free-floating, bobbing along on the ocean,” she said. “I felt
very ungrounded.” Friends noticed her becoming more reclusive; her
doctor increased her anti-depressants.
In
2015, she took a part-time job with a small business that supports
government researchers. Now 69, she has no interest in retiring again.
“As long as somebody wants me, I have a lot to contribute,” she said.
Most
retirees who returned to work told researchers they had long planned to
re-enter the work force. But among those who expected to remain retired
but then changed their minds, Dr. Maestas has identified a subgroup
going through “burnout and recovery.”